£6,000,000
Price + initial uses − bank debt
When buying a business, the purchase terms determine how much cash the buyer needs at closing and how much the acquired business must pay afterwards. Operating profit alone does not tell you whether the business can meet bank repayments, invest in its operations and pay the seller on the agreed dates.
This simulator combines operating assumptions with the proposed acquisition terms. It calculates five annual cash balances, highlights any funding shortfall and lets you test different assumptions. It is a free initial review for buyers and advisers. No company name or document upload is required; financial inputs stay in your browser.
PART 1
This is a fictional acquisition. The business has year-one revenue of £12m. After variable and fixed operating costs, its operating profit before depreciation, interest and tax (EBITDA) is £2m. The buyer pays £9m at closing and agrees a further fixed payment of £3m in year three.
The buyer borrows £4.2m at 8%, repaid through equal annual principal over seven years. Initial fees, integration and additional working capital total £0.9m, plus a £0.3m cash reserve. The buyer therefore needs £6m of equity at closing.
The question is whether the business can cover its operating cash needs, bank payments and the year-three seller payment. Under the assumptions below, bank-service coverage remains above the selected 1.2× threshold, but the seller payment creates a £1.28m funding shortfall in year three. The revenue downside shows what changes if revenue is 10% lower in every forecast year.
First review this worked case and its assumptions. Then enter a separate case in Part 2. Changes to your own case do not alter this example.
Price + initial uses − bank debt
First negative year-end balance: year 3
Passes your 1.2× threshold
Compare a smaller seller payment, a later payment, lower bank debt or more buyer equity. The model does not assume a lender or buyer will fund the gap. Passing the bank-service test does not cover the seller payment.
| Cash bridge | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 | Year 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | £12,000,000 | £12,360,000 | £12,730,800 | £13,112,724 | £13,506,106 |
| EBITDA | £2,000,000 | £2,094,000 | £2,191,500 | £2,292,619 | £2,397,478 |
| Cash available for payments¹ | £1,327,200 | £1,350,000 | £1,410,384 | £1,473,492 | £1,539,417 |
| Bank principal + interest | £936,000 | £888,000 | £840,000 | £792,000 | £744,000 |
| Fixed seller payment | £0 | £0 | £3,000,000 | £0 | £0 |
| Closing cash balance | £691,200 | £1,153,200 | -£1,276,416 | -£594,924 | £200,493 |
¹ EBITDA less cash tax, capital expenditure and incremental working capital. Bank coverage excludes seller payments.
PART 2
Enter your acquisition assumptions below. These inputs and results are separate from the worked case. You can use anonymous or hypothetical figures, and all monetary amounts must use the selected currency.
The form starts empty. If you want to explore alternatives to the worked case, choose “Copy worked-case assumptions”, change the terms and calculate. Copying those assumptions alone is not counted as a completed own analysis.
Enter zero where a cost or payment does not apply. Annual growth rates can be negative, above −100%. The seller payment is fixed, not an earn-out.
03 / WHAT THIS CHECK DOES
Contribution margin less fixed costs produces EBITDA. Revenue and costs grow at your selected rates. The downside reduces revenue by 10% in every year, without automatically cutting fixed costs.
Bank debt uses equal annual principal and interest on opening debt. Cash tax is floored at zero. Working capital is charged only on positive annual revenue growth. Year 1 is already normalised.
Cash accumulates over five years with no dividends, new loans or automatic equity top-ups. Seller consideration is a fixed payment, not an earn-out. A zero cash floor is used.
This is an initial screening tool, not a valuation or full due-diligence model. Annual balances can hide seasonal or intra-year shortfalls. Taxes are simplified; no loss carryforwards, debt tax limits, synergies or exit returns are modelled. Input quality determines result quality.